KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to significant
positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
A. An ability to apply
knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering |
Program Outcomes LevelA1. EBI Graduate Survey Not Applicable A2. Alumni Survey 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q2. Mathematics (calculus and above) Q3. Basic Sciences (chemistry, physics) Q6. Information Systems Q10. Mechanics (statics, dynamics, solids) Q11. Electronics Q12. Materials Science Q13. Thermal Sciences Q14. Computer-Aided Design Q16. Statistical Analysis.” A3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 1. Technical Skills: Application of technical abilities and accuracy. 3. Knowledge: Application of experience, skills, and knowledge gained during student's co-op work assignments. Q1: Demonstrated the ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and/or engineering. Curriculum LevelAA1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q1: Demonstrate the ability to apply
knowledge of mathematics, science, and/or engineering. Student Evaluation Q1: Demonstrate the ability to apply
knowledge of mathematics, science, and/or engineering. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelA1. EBI Graduate Survey Not Applicable A2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q2.
= 100% / 100% Q3.
= 80% / 100% Q6. = 60% / 57%Q10.
= 80% / 100% Q11.
= 100% / 86% Q12.
= 100% / 100% Q13.
= 80% / 100% Q14.
= 80% / 100% Q16.
= 100% / 86% A3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 3.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Q1. = 100% / 100% / 75%Curriculum LevelAA1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q1. = 100% Student Evaluation Q1. a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelA1. EBI Graduate Survey Not Applicable A2. Alumni Survey Q6. Need to utilize more information systems in
class and lab assignments. Utilize
more information systems in communicating with students such as email,
Blackboard, and web. Q2,
Q3, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q16: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. A3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1, 3: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q1: Employer and faculty think students are
doing well in this area but students do not entirely agree with it. Follow up and evaluate in future for
improvement. Curriculum LevelAA1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q1: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q1: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
B. An ability to design and conduct experiments, as
well as to analyze and interpret data |
Program Outcomes LevelB1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. Q15. How do you rate your satisfaction with the opportunities for practical experiences within Undergraduate curriculum? To what degree did your engineering
education enhance your ability to Q38. design experiments? Q39. conduct experiments? Q40. analyze and interpret
data? Q50. pilot test a component
prior to implementation? B2. Alumni Survey 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q8. Operations Design Q10.
Mechanics (statics, dynamics, solids) Q11.
Electronics Q12.
Materials Science Q13.
Thermal Sciences Q14.
Computer-aided Design Q16.
Statistical Analysis Q17.
Design of Experiments 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “education and co-op experience increased their abilities to.” E7. Use computing
technology in engineering analysis/design C7. Use computing
technology in engineering analysis/design B3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 2. Analytical Skills: Application of data analysis 5. Methodologies: Application of research, testing and/or design methodologies. Q2: Demonstrated the ability to design and conduct experiments, analyze and interpret data. Curriculum LevelBB1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q2: Demonstrate the ability to design and
conduct experiments, analyze and interpret data. Student Evaluation Q2: Demonstrate the ability to design and
conduct experiments, analyze and interpret data. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelB1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q15. Mean = 3.50 / 5.38 Q38. Mean = 5.00 / 4.75 Q39. Mean = 5.00 / 4.63 Q40. Mean = 5.00 / 5.63 Q50. Mean = 4.00 / 4.14 B2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q8.
= 80% / 100% Q10.
= 80% / 100% Q11.
= 100% / 86% Q12.
= 100% / 100% Q13.
= 80% / 100% Q14.
= 80% / 100% Q16.
= 100% / 86% Q17.
= 80% / 86% E7. = 60% / 86%C7. = 40% / 86%B3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 2. = 100% / 100% / 100% 5.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Q2. = 100% / 100% / 75%Curriculum LevelBB1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q2. = 80% Student Evaluation Q2. a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelB1. EBI Graduate Survey Q15: Increase the opportunities for students to
design and conduct experiments as well as to analyze and interpret data in
various laboratories. Q50: Increase the utilization of rapid prototyping
processes to make pilot products for experimentation and testing in MFGG 507
Polymer Processing and other classes. Q38, Q39, Q40: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. B2. Alumni Survey Q8, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q16, Q17: Criteria in
these areas are met. No remedial
actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E7: Increase the use of computers in required,
core, and elective MfgE courses. C7: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. B3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty / Student
Evaluations 2, 5: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q2: Employer and faculty think students are
doing well in this area but students do not entirely agree with it. Follow up and evaluate in future for
improvement. Curriculum LevelBB1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q2: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q2: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering and
communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
C. An ability to design
a system, component, or process to meet desired needs |
Program Outcomes LevelC1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. Q41. To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to design a system component or process to meet desired needs? C2. Alumni Survey 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q8. Operations Design Q10.
Mechanics (statics, dynamics, solids) Q11.
Electronics Q12.
Materials Science Q13.
Thermal Sciences Q14.
Computer-aided Design Q16.
Statistical Analysis Q17.
Design of Experiments 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate
“medium increase” and above to the statement that their “education and co-op
experience increased their abilities to.” E4. Analyze components, processes, or systems C4. Analyze components, processes, or systems E5. Design components,
processes, or systems C5. Design components,
processes, or systems E7. Use computing
technology in engineering analysis/design C7. Use computing
technology in engineering analysis/design C3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 5. Methodologies: Application of research, testing and/or design methodologies. 15. Value: Significant value added to your organization by providing a product or process that resulted in improved quality, reliability or performance. Q3: Demonstrated the ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs. Curriculum LevelCC1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q3: Ability to design a system, component
or process to meet desired needs. Student Evaluation Q3: Ability to design a system, component
or process to meet desired needs. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelC1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q41. Mean =
4.50 / 5.38 C2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q8.
= 80% / 100% Q10.
= 80% / 100% Q11.
= 100% / 86% Q12.
= 100% / 100% Q13.
= 80% / 100% Q14.
= 80% / 100% Q16.
= 100% / 86% Q17.
= 80% / 86% E4.
= 100% / 100% C4.
= 100% / 100% E5.
= 100% / 100% C5.
= 80% / 86% E7. = 60% / 86%C7. = 40% / 86%C3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 5.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 15.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Q3.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Curriculum LevelCC1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q3. = 100% Student Evaluation Q3. a. = 100% b. = 80% |
Program Outcomes LevelC1. EBI Graduate Survey Q41: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. C2. Alumni Survey Q8,
Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q16, Q17:
Criteria in these areas are met. No
remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E4,
C4, E5, C5: Criteria in these areas
are met. No remedial actions are
required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E7: Increase the use of computers in required,
core, and elective MfgE courses. C7: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. C3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 5, 15, Q3: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Curriculum LevelCC1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q3: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q3: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a manufacturing
environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering and
communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
D. An ability to function
on multi-disciplinary teams |
Program Outcomes LevelD1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. Q42. To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to function on multidisciplinary teams? How do you rate your satisfaction with Q17. the value derived from team experiences? Q18. the value of Engineering program student organization activities? Q19. the leadership opportunities in the Engineering programs extracurricular activities? How satisfied were you with Q31. the ability of your fellow students to work in teams? Q32. the level of camaraderie of your fellow students? D2. Alumni Survey 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q7. Management 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “education and co-op experience increased their abilities to.” E1. Function on multidisciplinary teams C1. Function on multidisciplinary teams D3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 6. Resourcefulness: Effective use of appropriate services and the expertise of staff during the development of the student's Senior Thesis Project. 7. Application of Skills: Project and time management skills; including adherence to Timing Chart and Plan of Attack. 8. Accountability: Exercise of initiative and responsibility. 9. Interpersonal: Overall maturity of the student in a work environment and in completing the Senior Thesis Project. 10. Team Work: Cooperation in working with teams (recognizes and values diverse relationships with customers, co-workers and supervisors). Q4: Demonstrated the ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams. Curriculum LevelDD1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q4: Demonstrate the ability to function on
multi-disciplinary teams. Student Evaluation Q4: Demonstrate the ability to function on
multi-disciplinary teams. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelD1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q42. Mean =
6.50 / 5.25 Q17. Mean =
5.00 / 5.00 Q18. Mean =
4.50 / 5.75 Q19. Mean =
5.50 / 5.38 Q31. Mean =
6.50 / 4.88 Q32. Mean =
5.00 / 5.13 D2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q7. = 60% / 100%E1.
= 80% / 100% C1.
= 80% / 100% D3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 6.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 7.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 8.
= 100% / 80% / 100% 9.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 10.
= 100% / 75% / 100% Q4.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Curriculum LevelDD1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q4. = 100% Student Evaluation Q4. a. = 100% b. = 88% |
Program Outcomes LevelD1. EBI Graduate Survey Q42, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q31, Q32: Criteria in these areas are met.
No remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. D2. Alumni Survey Q7: Response from 97-98 alumni showed a drop. Need to follow up on future results. E1, C1:
Criteria in these areas are met.
No remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. D3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 6, 7, 8, 9 and Q4: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. 10: Employer and students think this area
is good but faculty do not entirely agree with it. Follow up and evaluate in future for
improvement. Curriculum LevelDD1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q4: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q4: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
E. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve
engineering problems |
Program Outcomes LevelE1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to Q43. identify or formulate engineering problems? Q44. to solve engineering problems? E2. Alumni Survey 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q10. Mechanics (statics,
dynamics, solids) Q11.
Electronics Q12.
Materials Science Q13.
Thermal Sciences Q16.
Statistical Analysis Q17.
Design of Experiments 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “education and co-op experience increased their abilities to.” E3.
Solve open-ended problems C3.
Solve open-ended problems E7. Use computing
technology in engineering analysis/design C7. Use computing
technology in engineering analysis/design E3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 1. Technical Skills: Application of technical abilities and accuracy. 2. Analytical Skills: Application of data analysis 3. Knowledge: Application of experience, skills, and knowledge gained during student's co-op work assignments. 4. Systematic Processes: Application of systematic processes in the conduct of student's Senior Thesis Project. 5. Methodologies: Application of research, testing and/or design methodologies. 13. Problem Solving: Problems addressed effectively (evaluates relevant facts, generates alternatives, makes sound conclusions and timely decisions). 14. Value: Significant value added to your organization by accomplishing a directed or indirected cost savings. Q6: Demonstrated the ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. Curriculum LevelEE1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 3. Team Work: Works cooperatively, recognizes and
values diverse relationships with customers, co-workers and supervisors. 5. Commitment to Improvement: Initiative,
creativity and an ability to recommend concepts and ideas for improvement. 10. Problem Solving: Thinks through problems,
evaluates relevant facts, generates alternatives, makes sound conclusions and
timely decisions. Student Evaluation Q5: Ability to identify, formulate and solve
engineering problems. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelE1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q43. Mean =
5.50 / 5.25 Q44. Mean =
5.50 / 5.50 E2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q10.
= 80% / 100% Q11.
= 100% / 86% Q12.
= 100% / 100% Q13.
= 80% / 100% Q16.
= 100% / 86% Q17.
= 80% / 86% E3.
= 100% / 100% C3.
= 100% / 86% E7. = 60% / 86%C7. = 40% / 86%E3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 2.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 3.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 4.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 5.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 13.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 14.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Q6.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Curriculum LevelEE1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 3. = 100% 5. = 100% 10. = 100% Student Evaluation Q5. a. = 100% b. = 88% |
Program Outcomes LevelE1. EBI Graduate Survey Q43, Q44: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. E2. Alumni Survey Q10,
Q11, Q12, Q13, Q16, Q17: Criteria in
these areas are met. No remedial
actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E3,
C3: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. E7: Increase the use of computers in required,
core, and elective MfgE courses. C7: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. E3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 14 and Q6: Criteria in these
areas are met. No remedial actions are
required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Curriculum LevelEE1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 3, 5, 10: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q5: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
F. An understanding of
professional and ethical responsibility |
Program Outcomes LevelF1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. Q45. To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to understand ethical responsibilities? To what degree did your major design experience address Q56. Economic issues? Q57. Environmental issues? Q58. Sustainability issues? Q59. Manufacturability issues? Q60. Ethical issues? Q61. Health and Safety issues? Q62. Social issues? Q63. Political issues? F2. Alumni Survey 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that their
“degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q7. Management 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “education and co-op experience increased their abilities to” E2. Function in ethnically/culturally diverse
environments C2. Function in ethnically/culturally diverse
environments F3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 7. Application of Skills: Project and time management skills; including adherence to Timing Chart and Plan of Attack. 8. Accountability: Exercise of initiative and responsibility. 14. Value: Significant value added to your organization by accomplishing a directed or indirected cost savings. Q5: Demonstrated understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. Curriculum LevelFF1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 1. Quality of
Work: Neatness, accuracy and thoroughness. 2. Quality of
Work: Volume of work performed, assignments completed or transactions
processed relative to job standards and/or requirements. 3. Team Work: Works cooperatively,
recognizes and values diverse relationships with customers, co-workers and
supervisors. 5. Commitment
to Improvement: Initiative, creativity and an ability to recommend concepts
and ideas for improvement. 6. Attitude: Interest and enthusiasm for
work assigned for the department and for the company. 11. Attendance: Punctual and conscientious
about absences. Q5: Demonstrated understanding of
professional and ethical responsibility. Student Evaluation Q6: Demonstrated understanding of
professional and ethical responsibility a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelF1. EBI Graduate Survey
Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q45. Mean =
4.50 / 4.63 Q56. Mean =
3.50 / 4.29 Q57. Mean =
3.00 / 3.71 Q58. Mean =
3.00 / 4.57 Q59. Mean =
4.00 / 5.86 Q60. Mean =
3.50 / 3.86 Q61. Mean =
3.00 / 4.43 Q62. Mean =
2.50 / 3.71 Q63. Mean =
2.50 / 3.29 F2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q7. = 60% / 100%E2.
= 40% / 100% C2.
= 20% / 71% F3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 7. = 100% / 100% / 100% 8. = 100% / 80% / 100% 14. = 100% / 100% / 100% Q5.
= 100% / 100% / 25% Curriculum LevelFF1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 1. = 100% 2. = 100% 3. = 100% 5. = 100% 6. = 100% 11. = 92% Q5. = 100% Student Evaluation Q6. a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelF1. EBI Graduate Survey
Q45: Although this one meets the criteria, the
results from Q56-Q63 do not meet the criteria. More discussions of professional and
ethical responsibilities are needed in various MfgE courses. Q56-Q63:
Student experiences in these areas are limited. Capstone design course needs to address
these issues. Lower level courses
should also incorporate these discussions when it is possible. F2. Alumni Survey Q7: Response from 97-98 alumni showed a drop. Need to follow up on future results. Q7:
Criteria in this area are met for
96-97 alumni. No remedial actions are
required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E2,
C2: This depends on university and
co-op environments. We can encourage
students to participate in international students events. F3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 7, 8, 14: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q5: Employer and faculty think students are
doing well in this area but only 25% students agree with it. Capstone Design course and other relevant
courses should address professional and ethical responsibility. Faculty curriculum committee has met in
the winter 2002 to discuss this problem.
The whole curriculum has been examined to make sure “soft outcomes”
such as this one is covered. Curriculum LevelFF1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 1,2,3,5,6,11,Q5: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q6: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
G. An ability to
communicate effectively |
Program Outcomes LevelG1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to Q48. communicate using oral progress reports? Q49. communicate using written progress reports? How do you rate your satisfaction with Q16. the opportunities for interaction with practitioners? Q17. the value derived from team experiences? Q18. the value of Engineering program student organization activities? Q19. the leadership opportunities in the Engineering programs extracurricular activities? Q26. the quality of computing resources? Q28. the remote access to the computer network at your Engineering School? Q29. the training to utilize the computing resources at your Engineering School? G2. Alumni Survey 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q6. Information Systems Q7. Management Q14.
Computer-aided Design Q18.
Written Communication Skills Q19.
Oral Communication Skills 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that their “education and co-op experience increased their abilities to” E2. Function in ethnically/culturally diverse
environments C2. Function in ethnically/culturally diverse
environments E6. Use computing technology in communication C6. Use computing technology in communication E7. Use computing technology in engineering
analysis/design C7. Use computing technology in engineering
analysis/design G3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty / Student
Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 6. Resourcefulness: Effective use of appropriate services and the expertise of staff during the development of the student's Senior Thesis Project. 7. Application of Skills: Project and time management skills; including adherence to Timing Chart and Plan of Attack. 9. Interpersonal: Overall maturity of the student in a work environment and in completing the Senior Thesis Project. 10. Team Work: Cooperation in working with teams (recognizes and values diverse relationships with customers, co-workers and supervisors). 11. Communication - Oral: Ability to orally convey information and present ideas clearly and concisely. 12. Communication - Written: Quality of student's Senior Thesis Project documentation. 17. Meetings: Timely arrangement of necessary meetings. 18. Instructions: Adherence to all of Thesis Handbook instructions for preparing the Preliminary Thesis Document. Q7a: Demonstrated the ability to communicate effectively through interpersonal skills. Q7b: Demonstrated the ability to communicate effectively through formal presentations. Curriculum LevelGG1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 5. Commitment to Improvement: Initiative,
creativity and an ability to recommend concepts and ideas for improvement. 7. Interpersonal: Ability to be sensitive
to and respectful of the needs and feelings of others, to develop rapport and
trust. 9. Communication - Written: Ability to
communicate through memos, reports, etc. Student Evaluation Q7a: Ability to communicate effectively
through interpersonal skills. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience Q7b: Ability to communicate effectively
through formal presentations. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience Q7c: Ability to communicate effectively
through writing. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelG1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q48.
Mean = 6.00 / 5.00 Q49.
Mean = 5.50 / 4.50 Q16.
Mean = 4.00 /5.14 Q17.
Mean = 5.00 / 5.00 Q18.
Mean = 4.50 / 5.75 Q19.
Mean = 5.50 / 5.38 Q26.
Mean = 5.50 / 5.50 Q28.
Mean = 6.00 / 3.86 Q29.
Mean = 5.00 / 3.71 G2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q6.
= 60% / 57% Q7.
= 60% / 100% Q14.
= 80% / 100% Q18.
= 80% / 57% Q19.
= 80% / 57% E2.
= 40% / 100% C2.
= 20% / 71% E6.
= 80% / 57% C6.
= 100% / 86% E7.
= 60% / 86% C7.
= 40% / 86% G3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 6.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 7.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 9.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 10.
= 100% / 75% / 100% 11.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 12.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 17.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 18.
= 100% / 60% / 100% Q7a. = 100% / 80% / 50%Q7b. = 100% / 100% / 67%Curriculum LevelGG1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 5. = 100% 7. = 100% 9. = 100% Student Evaluation Q7a. a. = 100% b. = 100% Q7b. a. = 100% b. = 86% Q7c. a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelG1. EBI Graduate Survey Q48, Q49, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q26, Q28, Q29:
Criteria in these areas are met. No
remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Q16: this is the only one that does not
meet the criteria. However, we feel
that student co-op experience should be sufficient to cover this. G2. Alumni Survey Q6:
Utilize more information systems in communicating with students such as
email, Blackboard, and web. Q7:
Encourage students in class to participate in team project to learn how to
communicate with peers and manage projects. Q14,
Q18, Q19: Criteria in these areas are
met from 97-98 alumni responses. No
remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E2,
C2: This depends on university and
co-op environments. We can encourage
students to participate in international students events. E6, C6:
Criteria in these areas are met
except C6 in 96-97 results. No
remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E7: Increase the use of computers in required,
core, and elective MfgE courses. Faculty curriculum committee has met in the winter
2002 to discuss this problem. Further
discussions will continue in the spring 2002.
C7: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. G3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, and 17: Criteria in these areas
are met. No remedial actions are
required. Evaluate in future for improvement. 10: Employer and faculty think students are
doing well in this area but students do not entirely agree with it. Follow up and evaluate in future for
improvement. 18. 60% of Faculty are not satisfied with
students’ performance in preparing the Preliminary Thesis Document. This reflects students’ communication in
written form. Faculty thesis advisors
should remind students in this regard.
Q7a and Q7b: More than half of students think Kettering
University did not prepare them well in communication through interpersonal
skills and formal presentations.
Faculty curriculum committee has met in the winter 2002 to discuss
this problem. The whole curriculum has
been examined to make sure “soft outcomes” such as this one is covered. Curriculum LevelGG1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 5, 7, 9: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q7a, Q7b, Q7c: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
H. The broad education
necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and
societal context |
Program Outcomes LevelH1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. Q46. To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global/societal context? To what degree did your major design experience address Q56. Economic issues? Q57. Environmental issues? Q58. Sustainability issues? Q59. Manufacturability issues? Q60. Ethical issues? Q61. Health and Safety issues? Q62. Social issues? Q63. Political issues? Q67. How did the quality of teaching in your Engineering courses compare to the quality of teaching in your Non-Engineering courses on this campus? H2. Alumni Survey 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q4. Accounting Q5. Marketing Q9. Humanities/Social Science Q15.
Engineering Economics 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that their “education and co-op experience increased their abilities to” E2. Function in ethnically/culturally diverse
environments C2. Function in ethnically/culturally diverse
environments 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “education and co-op experience increased your awareness of ” Q20. The history of technical applications Q22. Contemporary issues Q24. The impact of engineering solutions in
societal/global context H3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 14. Value: Significant value added to your organization by accomplishing a directed or indirected cost savings. Q8: Demonstrated broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. Curriculum LevelHH1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q6: Demonstrated broad education necessary
to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal
context. Student Evaluation Q8: Demonstrated broad education necessary
to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal
context. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelH1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q46. Mean = 5.00 / 4.75 Q56. Mean =
3.50 / 4.29 Q57. Mean =
3.00 / 3.71 Q58. Mean =
3.00 / 4.57 Q59. Mean =
4.00 / 5.86 Q60. Mean =
3.50 / 3.86 Q61. Mean =
3.00 / 4.43 Q62. Mean =
2.50 / 3.71 Q63. Mean =
2.50 / 3.29 Q67. Mean = 6.50 / 4.75 H2. Alumni SurveyFormat Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q4.
= 40% / 86% Q5.
= 20% / 29% Q9.
= 60% / 29% Q15.
= 60% / 86% E2.
= 40% / 100% C2.
= 20% / 71% Q20.
= 60% / 71% Q22.
= 40% / 86% Q24.
= 60% / 86% H3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 14. = 100% / 100% / 100% Q8.
= 100% / 100% / 25% Curriculum LevelHH1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q6. = 100% Student Evaluation Q8. a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelH1. EBI Graduate Survey Q46. Criteria
in this area are met. No remedial
actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Q56-Q63:
Student experiences in these areas are limited. Capstone design course needs to address
these issues. Lower level courses
should also incorporate these discussions when it is possible. Q67: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. H2. Alumni SurveyQ4, Q5, Q9, Q15: These areas are weak. The information should be made available to non-engineering course instructors. Need to exam MfgE curriculum to ensure proper coverage of these areas. E2,
C2: This depends on university and
co-op environments. We can encourage
students to participate in international students events. Q20, Q22 Q24: These areas are weak. The information should be made available to non-engineering course instructors. Need to exam MfgE curriculum to ensure proper coverage of these areas. Faculty curriculum committee has met in the winter 2002 to discuss this problem. The whole curriculum has been examined to make sure “soft outcomes” such as this one is covered. H3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 14: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q8. Faculty curriculum committee has met in
the winter 2002 to discuss this problem.
The whole curriculum has been examined to make sure “soft outcomes”
such as this one is covered. Curriculum LevelHH1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q6: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q8: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the manufacturability
of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
I. A recognition of the
need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning |
Program Outcomes LevelI1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. Q52. To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to recognizing the need to engage in lifelong learning? I2. Alumni Survey Q1.
Less than 20% of MfgE Alumni indicate “Been working only” after graduating
from Kettering/GMI. 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate
“medium increase” and above to the statement that their “education and co-op
experience increased their abilities to” E11. Engage in life-long learning C11. Engage in life-long learning I3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: Q9: Recognized the need for and demonstrated the ability to engage in life long learning. Curriculum LevelII1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 4. Ability to Learn: Willingness to learn
new work and retain what is learned. Q9: Recognition of the need for and ability
to engage in life-long learning. Student Evaluation Q9: Recognition of the need for and ability
to engage in life-long learning. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelI1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q52. Mean = 6.00 / 4.75 I2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q1. = 0% / 43%E11.
= 80% / 100% C11.
= 100% / 100% I3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations Q9. = 100% / 100% / 100% Curriculum LevelII1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 4. = 100% Q9. = 100% Student Evaluation Q9. a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelI1. EBI Graduate Survey Q52: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. I2. Alumni Survey Q1:
none of the MfgE alumni responding to the survey had taken any courses or
pursuing advanced degrees. We need to
encourage students to engage in life-long learning. Proper way of doing this will be discussed
in Faculty Curriculum and Assessment Committee meetings. From the results of Q52 and Q1, it appears
that alumni recognized the need to engage in life-long learning but they
simply did not do it for whatever reasons.
E11,
C11: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. I3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations Q9: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Curriculum LevelII1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation 4, Q9: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q9: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
J. A knowledge of
contemporary issues |
Program Outcomes LevelJ1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. To what degree did your major design experience address Q56. Economic issues? Q57. Environmental issues? Q58. Sustainability issues? Q59. Manufacturability issues? Q60. Ethical issues? Q61. Health and Safety issues? Q62. Social issues? Q63. Political issues? J2. Alumni Survey 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q9. Humanities/Social Science 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that their “education and co-op experience increased their abilities to” E2. Function in ethnically/culturally diverse
environments C2. Function in ethnically/culturally diverse
environments 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “education and co-op experience increased your awareness of ” Q22. Contemporary issues J3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: Q10: Demonstrated knowledge of contemporary issues. Curriculum LevelJJ1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation N/A Student Evaluation Q10: Knowledge of contemporary issues. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelJ1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q56. Mean =
3.50 / 4.29 Q57. Mean =
3.00 / 3.71 Q58. Mean =
3.00 / 4.57 Q59. Mean =
4.00 / 5.86 Q60. Mean =
3.50 / 3.86 Q61. Mean =
3.00 / 4.43 Q62. Mean =
2.50 / 3.71 Q63. Mean =
2.50 / 3.29 J2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q9. = 60% / 29%E2.
= 40% / 100% C2.
= 20% / 71% Q22. = 40% / 86%J3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations Q10. = 100% / 100% / 25% Curriculum LevelJJ1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation N/A Student Evaluation Q10. a. = 67% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelJ1. EBI Graduate Survey Q56-Q63:
Student experiences in these areas are limited. Capstone design course needs to address
these issues. Lower level courses
should also incorporate these discussions when it is possible. J2. Alumni Survey Q9:
This area is marginal. The information
should be made available to non-engineering course instructors. Need to exam MfgE curriculum to ensure
proper coverage of this area. E2,
C2: This depends on university and
co-op environments. We can encourage
students to participate in international students events. Q22:
This area is weak. The information
should be made available to non-engineering course instructors. Need to exam MfgE curriculum to ensure
proper coverage of this area. J3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations Q10: Employer and faculty think students
are doing well in this area but 75% students do not agree with it. Follow up and evaluate in future for
improvement. Faculty curriculum
committee has met in the winter 2002 to discuss this problem. The whole curriculum has been examined to
make sure “soft outcomes” such as this one is covered. Curriculum LevelJJ1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation N/A Student Evaluation Q10:
This area is weak. Need to exam MfgE
curriculum to ensure proper coverage of this area. Faculty
curriculum committee has met in the winter 2002 to discuss this problem. The whole curriculum has been examined to
make sure “soft outcomes” such as this one is covered. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
K. An ability to use the
techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
practice |
Program Outcomes LevelK1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. Q15. How do you rate your satisfaction with the opportunities for practical experiences within Undergraduate curriculum? How do you rate your satisfaction with Q26. the quality of computing resources? Q27. the availability of computers in Engineering School? Q28. the remote access to the computer network at your Engineering School? Q29. the training to utilize the computing resources at your Engineering School? To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to use Q47. modern engineering tools? Q51. text materials to support project design? To what degree did your major design experience address Q53. build on the knowledge from previous course work? Q55. incorporate engineering standards? To what degree did the laboratory facilities Q64. establish an atmosphere conductive to learning? Q66. allow you to use modern engineering tools? K2. Alumni Survey 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q6. Information Systems Q10. Mechanics (statics, dynamics, solids) Q11. Electronics Q12. Materials Science Q13. Thermal Sciences Q14. Computer-aided Design Q16. Statistical Analysis Q17. Design of Experiments 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that their “education and co-op experience increased their abilities to” E6. Use computing technology in communication C6. Use computing technology in communication E7. Use computing technology in engineering
analysis/design C7. Use computing technology in engineering
analysis/design E9. Use computing technology in
accounting/finance C9. Use computing technology in
accounting/finance E10. Use computing
technology in operations analysis/design C10. Use computing
technology in operations analysis/design 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “education and co-op experience increased your awareness of ” Q21.
Current engineering practices Q31. 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate “neutral” and above to their Thesis Projects. K3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 3. Knowledge: Application of experience, skills, and knowledge gained during student's co-op work assignments. 4. Systematic Processes: Application of systematic processes in the conduct of student's Senior Thesis Project. 5. Methodologies: Application of research, testing and/or design methodologies. 7. Application of Skills: Project and time management skills; including adherence to Timing Chart and Plan of Attack. 14. Value: Significant value added to your organization by accomplishing a directed or indirected cost savings. Q11: Demonstrated ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Curriculum LevelKK1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q7: Demonstrated ability to use the
techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
practice. Student Evaluation Q11: Ability to use the techniques, skills,
and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelK1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q15. Mean = 3.50 / 5.38 Q26. Mean = 5.50 / 5.50 Q27. Mean = 5.00 / 5.88 Q28. Mean = 6.00 / 3.86 Q29. Mean = 5.00 / 3.71 Q47. Mean = 4.50 / 5.38 Q51. Mean = 5.00 / 4.50 Q53. Mean = 5.00 / 5.29 Q55. Mean = 4.50 / 5.57 Q64. Mean = 5.00 / 5.00 Q66. Mean = 4.00 / 4.50 K2. Alumni Survey Q6. = 60% / 57%Q10.
= 80% / 100% Q11.
= 100% / 86% Q12.
= 100% / 100% Q13.
= 80% / 100% Q14.
= 80% / 100% Q16.
= 100% / 86% Q17.
= 80% / 86% E6.
= 80% / 57% C6.
= 100% / 86% E7.
= 60% / 86% C7.
= 40% / 86% E9.
= 20% / 29% C9.
= 0% / 0% E10.
= 60% / 86% C10.
= 80% / 57% Q21.
= 80% / 100% Q31.
= 60% / 86% K3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 3.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 4.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 5.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 7.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 14.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Q11. = 100% / 100% / 75%Curriculum LevelKK1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q7. = 100% Student Evaluation Q11. a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelK1. EBI Graduate Survey Q15: Increase the opportunities for students to
design and conduct experiments as well as to analyze and interpret data in
various laboratories. Q26,
Q27, Q28, Q29: Criteria in these
areas are met. No remedial actions are
required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Q47,
Q51: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. Q53,
Q55, Q64: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. Q66.
Increase the use of CAD/CAM/CAE and rapid prototyping machine in
course with design components and in the Capstone design class. K2. Alumni Survey Q6:
Utilize more information systems in communicating with students such as
email, Blackboard, and web. Faculty
curriculum committee has met in the winter 2002 to discuss this problem. More discussions will continue in Spring
2002. Q10,
Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q16, Q17: Criteria
in these areas are met. No remedial
actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E6,
C6: Criteria in these areas are met.
No remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E7: Increase the use of computers in required,
core, and elective MfgE courses. C7: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. E9,
C9: These areas are not applicable to
MfgE program. The information should
be made available to non-engineering course instructors. These two questions can be considered to
disconnect from Program Outcome A. E10:
Increase the use of computers and software in operations analysis/design in
MfgE core and elective courses. Q21:
Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q31. MfgE faculty advisors will review and advise senior theses to ensure the quality of thesis projects. K3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 3, 4, 5, 7, and 14: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. Q11: Employer and faculty think students
are doing well in this area but students do not entirely agree with it. Follow up and evaluate in future for
improvement. Curriculum LevelKK1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q7: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q11: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
L. Have proficiency in
materials and manufacturing processes: understanding the behavior and
properties of materials as they are altered and influenced by processing in
manufacturing. |
Program Outcomes LevelL1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. Q15. How do you rate your satisfaction with the opportunities for practical experiences within Undergraduate curriculum? To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to Q38. Design experiments? Q39. Conduct experiments? Q40. Analyze and interpret data? Q41. Design a system component or process to meet desired needs? Q43. Identify or formulate engineering problems? Q44. Solve engineering problems? Q47. Use modern engineering tools? Q49. Communicate using written progress reports? To what degree did your major design experience build on Q53. The knowledge from previous course work? Q54. Skills from previous course work? To what degree did your major design experience Q55. Incorporate engineering standards? Q61. Address Health and Safety issues? Q66. To what degree did the laboratory facilities allow you to use modern engineering tools? L2. Alumni Survey 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q10. Mechanics (statics, dynamics, solids) Q12.
Materials Science Q16.
Statistical Analysis Q17.
Design of Experiments 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that their “education and co-op experience increased their abilities to” E3. Solve open-ended
problems C3. Solve open-ended
problems E4. Analyze components,
processes, or systems C4. Analyze components,
processes, or systems E5. Design components,
processes, or systems C5. Design components,
processes, or systems E7. Use computing
technology in engineering analysis/design C7. Use computing
technology in engineering analysis/design 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “education and co-op experience increased your awareness of ” Q21. Current engineering practices L3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 1. Technical Skills: Application of technical abilities and accuracy. 2. Analytical Skills: Application of data analysis 3. Knowledge: Application of experience, skills, and knowledge gained during student's co-op work assignments. Q1: Demonstrated the ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and/or engineering. Q11: Demonstrated ability to use the techniques, skills , and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Curriculum LevelLL1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q1: Demonstrate the ability to apply
knowledge of mathematics, science, and/or engineering. Q7: Demonstrated ability to use the
techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
practice. Student Evaluation Q1: Demonstrate the ability to apply
knowledge of mathematics, science, and/or engineering. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience Q11: Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelL1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q15. Mean
= 3.50 / 5.38 Q38. Mean = 5.00 / 4.75 Q39. Mean = 5.00 / 4.63 Q40. Mean = 5.00 / 5.63 Q41. Mean = 4.50 / 5.38 Q43. Mean = 5.50 / 5.25 Q44. Mean = 5.50 / 5.50 Q47. Mean = 4.50 / 5.38 Q49. Mean = 5.50 / 4.50 Q53. Mean = 5.00 / 5.29 Q54. Mean = 4.50 / 5.71 Q55. Mean = 4.50 / 5.57 Q61. Mean
= 3.00 / 4.43 Q66. Mean
= 4.00 / 4.50 L2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q10. = 80% / 100% Q12. = 100% / 100% Q16. = 100% / 86% Q17. = 80% / 86% E3. = 100% / 100% C3. = 100% / 86% E4. = 100% / 100% C4. = 100% / 100% E5. = 100% / 100% C5. = 80% / 86% E7. =
60% / 86% C7. =
40% / 86% Q21. = 80% / 100% L3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 2.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 3.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Q1. = 100% / 100% / 75%Q11. = 100% / 100% / 75%Curriculum LevelLL1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q1. = 100% Q7. = 100% Student Evaluation Q1. a. = 100% b. = 100% Q11. a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelL1. EBI Graduate Survey Q15: Increase the opportunities for students to
design and conduct experiments as well as to analyze and interpret data in
various laboratories. Q38,
Q39, Q40, Q41, Q43, Q44, Q47, Q49, Q53, Q54, Q55: Criteria in these areas are met.
No remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Q61:
Student experiences in this area are limited. Capstone design course needs to address
these issues. Lower level courses
should also incorporate these discussions when it is possible. Q66.
Increase the use of CAD/CAM/CAE and rapid prototyping machine in
course with design components and in the Capstone design class. L2. Alumni Survey Q10,
Q12, Q16, Q17: Criteria in these
areas are met. No remedial actions are
required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E3,
C3, E4, C4, E5, C5: Criteria in these
areas are met. No remedial actions are
required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E7: Increase the use of computers in required,
core, and elective MfgE courses. C7: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. Q21:
Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. L3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1, 2 and 3: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q1, Q11: Employer and faculty think
students are doing well in this area but students do not entirely agree with
it. Follow up and evaluate in future
for improvement. Curriculum LevelLL1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q1, Q7: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q1, Q11: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
M. Have proficiency in
process, assembly and product engineering: understanding the design of
products and the equipment, tooling and environment necessary for their
manufacture |
Program Outcomes LevelM1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. How do you rate your satisfaction with Q15. The opportunities for practical experiences within Undergraduate curriculum? Q26. The quality of computing resources? Q29. The training to utilize the computing resources at your Engineering School? To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to Q38. Design experiments? Q39. Conduct experiments? Q40. Analyze and interpret data? Q41. Design a system component or process to meet desired needs? Q42. Function on multidisciplinary teams? Q43. Identify or formulate engineering problems? Q44. Solve engineering problems? Q45. Understand ethical responsibilities? Q46. Understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global/societal context? Q47. Modern engineering tools? Q48. Communicate using oral progress reports? Q49. Communicate using written progress reports? Q50. Pilot test a component prior to implementation? Q51. Use text materials to support project design? To what degree did your major design experience Q53. Build on the knowledge from previous course work? Q54. Build on skills from previous course work? Q55. Incorporate engineering standards? Q56. Address Economic issues? Q57. Address Environmental issues? Q58. Address Sustainability issues? Q59. Address Manufacturability issues? Q60. Address Ethical issues? Q61. Address Health and Safety issues? Q62. Address Social issues? Q63. Address Political issues? Q66. To what degree did the laboratory facilities allow your to use modern engineering tools? M2. Alumni Survey 80% of
MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that their
“degree to which education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q6. Information Systems Q8. Operations Design Q14. Computer-aided Design Q16. Statistical Analysis Q17. Design of Experiments 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that their “education and co-op experience increased their abilities to” E1. Function on multidisciplinary teams C1. Function on multidisciplinary teams E2. Function in ethnically/culturally diverse environments C2. Function in ethnically/culturally diverse environments E3. Solve open-ended problems C3. Solve open-ended problems E4. Analyze components, processes, or systems C4. Analyze components, processes, or systems E5. Design components, processes, or systems C5. Design components, processes, or systems E6. Use computing technology in communication C6. Use computing technology in communication E7. Use computing technology in engineering analysis/design C7. Use computing technology in engineering analysis/design E10. Use computing technology in operations analysis/design C10. Use computing technology in operations analysis/design 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “education and co-op experience increased your awareness of ” Q21. Current engineering practices Q23. Current business practices Q24. The impact of engineering solutions in societal/global context Q25. Professional/ethical responsibilities M3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 1. Technical Skills: Application of technical abilities and accuracy. 5. Methodologies: Application of research, testing and/or design methodologies. Q3: Demonstrated the ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs. Q8: Demonstrated broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. Q11: Demonstrated ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Curriculum LevelMM1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q3: Demonstrate the ability to design a
system, component or process to meet desired needs. Q7: Demonstrated ability to use the
techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
practice. Student Evaluation Q3: Ability to design a system, component
or process to meet desired needs. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience Q11: Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering
tools necessary for engineering practice. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program
Outcomes Level M1.
EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q15. Mean = 3.50 / 5.38 Q26. Mean = 5.50 / 5.50 Q29. Mean = 5.00 / 3.71 Q38. Mean = 5.00 / 4.75 Q39. Mean = 5.00 / 4.63 Q40. Mean = 5.00 / 5.63 Q41. Mean = 4.50 / 5.38 Q42. Mean = 6.50 / 5.25 Q43. Mean = 5.50 / 5.25 Q44. Mean = 5.50 / 5.50 Q45. Mean = 4.50 / 4.63 Q46. Mean = 5.00 / 4.75 Q47. Mean = 4.50 / 5.38 Q48. Mean = 6.00 / 5.00 Q49. Mean = 5.50 / 4.50 Q50. Mean = 4.00 / 4.14 Q51. Mean = 5.00 / 4.50 Q53. Mean = 5.00 / 5.29 Q54. Mean = 4.50 / 5.71 Q55. Mean = 4.50 / 5.57 Q56. Mean = 3.50 / 4.29 Q57. Mean = 3.00 / 3.71 Q58. Mean = 3.00 / 4.57 Q59. Mean = 4.00 / 5.86 Q60. Mean = 3.50 / 3.86 Q61. Mean = 3.00 / 4.43 Q62. Mean = 2.50 / 3.71 Q63. Mean = 2.50 / 3.29 Q66. Mean = 4.00 / 4.50 M2.
Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q6. = 60% / 57% Q8. = 80% / 100% Q14. = 80% / 100% Q16. = 100% / 86% Q17. = 80% / 86% E1. = 80% / 100% C1. = 80% / 100% E2. =
40% / 100% C2. =
20% / 71% E3. = 100% / 100% C3. = 100% / 86% E4. = 100% / 100% C4. = 100% / 100% E5. = 100% / 100% C5. = 80% / 86% E6. =
80% / 57% C6. = 100% / 86% E7. =
60% / 86% C7. =
40% / 86% E10. =
60% / 86% C10. =
80% / 57% Q21. = 80% / 100% Q23. =
60% / 71% Q24. =
60% / 86% Q25. =
60% / 100% M3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1. = 100% / 100% / 100% 5. = 100% / 100% / 100% Q3. = 100% / 100% / 100% Q8.
= 100% / 100% / 25% Q11.
= 100% / 100% / 75% Curriculum LevelMM1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q3. = 100% Q7. = 100% Student Evaluation Q3. a. = 100% b. = 80% Q11. = 100% a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelM1. EBI Graduate Survey Q15: Increase the opportunities for
students to design and conduct experiments as well as to analyze and
interpret data in various laboratories.
Faculty advisors of senior theses should communicate with students’
employers to ensure they are working in the areas of manufacturing. Students should have a minimum of 6 to 7
co-op terms. Q26: Criteria
in this area are met. No remedial
actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Q29: Training seems improved from 2000 to
2001. No remedial actions are
required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Q38, Q39, Q40, Q41, Q42, Q43, Q44, Q45,
Q46, Q47, Q48, Q49: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q50: Increase the utilization of rapid prototyping
processes to make pilot products for experimentation and testing in MFGG 507
Polymer Processing and other classes. Q53, Q54, Q55: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. Q56, Q57, Q58, Q58, Q59, Q60, Q61, Q62, Q63: Student experiences in these areas are
limited. Capstone design course needs
to address these issues. Lower level
courses should also incorporate these discussions when it is possible. Q66.
Increase the use of CAD/CAM/CAE and rapid prototyping machine in
course with design components and in the Capstone design class. M2. Alumni Survey Q6. Need to utilize more information systems in
class and lab assignments. Utilize
more information systems in communicating with students such as email,
Blackboard, and web. Q8,
Q14, Q16, Q17: Criteria in these areas are met.
No remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E1,
C1, E3, C3, E4, C4, E5 and C5: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. E2,
C2: This depends on university and
co-op environments. We can encourage
students to participate in international students events. E6,
C6: Use of computing technology has been improved from 96-97 to 97-98
results. E7: Increase the use of computers in required,
core, and elective MfgE courses. C7: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. E10,
C10: More use of computing technology in engineering analysis/design is
needed. This has been brought to
faculty’s attention in the winter term of 2002. Action plans will be discussed in the
spring 2002. Q21:
Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q23,
Q24 and Q25: These are soft outcomes and need to be better covered in MfgE
curriculum. Faculty committee has met
in the winter term of 2002 to exam the coverage of the soft outcomes. For example, include more discussions in
class and use projects that simulate real world business practices, and use
examples to discuss professional and ethical responsibilities. M3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1, 5 and Q3: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q8: Employer and faculty think students are
doing well in this area but students do not entirely agree with it. Faculty curriculum committee has met in the
winter 2002 to discuss this problem.
The whole curriculum has been examined to make sure “soft outcomes”
such as this one is covered. Follow
up and evaluate in future for improvement Q11: Employer and faculty think students
are doing well in this area but students do not entirely agree with it. Follow up and evaluate in future for
improvement. Curriculum LevelMM1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q3, Q7: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q3, Q11: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
N. Have proficiency in manufacturing competitiveness:
understanding the creation of competitive advantage through manufacturing
planning, strategy and control. |
Program Outcomes LevelN1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to Q41. Design a system component or process to meet desired needs? Q42. Function on multidisciplinary teams? Q43. Identify or formulate engineering problems? Q44. Solve engineering problems? Q46. Understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global/societal context? Q47. Use modern engineering tools? Q48. Communicate using oral progress reports? Q49. Communicate using written progress reports? To what degree did your major design experience Q53. Build on the knowledge from previous course work? Q54. Build on skills from previous course work? Q55. Incorporate engineering standards? Q56. Address Economic issues? Q57. Address Environmental issues? Q58. Address Sustainability issues? Q60. Address Ethical issues? Q61. Address Health and Safety issues? Q62. Address Social issues? Q63. Address Political issues? Q66. To what degree did the laboratory facilities allow you to use modern engineering tools? N2. Alumni Survey 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate
“medium increase” and above to the statement that their “degree to which
education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q4. Accounting Q5. Marketing Q6. Information Systems Q7. Management Q8. Operations Design 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate
“medium increase” and above to the statement that their “education and co-op
experience increased their abilities to.” E4. Analyze components, processes, or systems C4. Analyze components, processes, or systems E5. Design components, processes, or systems C5. Design components, processes, or systems E6. Use computing technology in communication C6. Use computing technology in communication E7. Use computing technology in engineering analysis/design C7. Use computing technology in engineering analysis/design E8. Use computing technology in marketing C8. Use computing technology in marketing E9. Use computing technology in accounting/finance C9. Use computing technology in accounting/finance E10. Use computing technology in operations analysis/design C10. Use computing technology in operations analysis/design 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and
above to the statement that their “education and co-op experience increased
your awareness of ” Q21. Current engineering
practices Q22. Contemporary issues Q23. Current business practices Q24. The impact of engineering solutions in societal/global
context Q25. Professional/ethical responsibilities N3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 1. Technical Skills: Application of technical abilities and accuracy. 14. Value: Significant value added to your organization by accomplishing a directed or indirected cost savings. 15. Value: Significant value added to your organization by providing a product or process that resulted in improved quality, reliability or performance. Q11: Demonstrated ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Curriculum LevelNN1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q7: Demonstrated ability to use the
techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
practice. Student Evaluation Q11: Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering
tools necessary for engineering practice. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelN1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q41. Mean = 4.50 / 5.38 Q42. Mean = 6.50 / 5.25 Q43. Mean = 5.50 / 5.25 Q44. Mean = 5.50 / 5.50 Q46. Mean = 5.00 / 4.75 Q47. Mean = 4.50 / 5.38 Q48. Mean = 6.00 / 5.00 Q49. Mean = 5.50 / 4.50 Q53. Mean = 5.00 / 5.29 Q54. Mean = 4.50 / 5.71 Q55. Mean = 4.50 / 5.57 Q56. Mean
= 3.50 / 4.29 Q57. Mean
= 3.00 / 3.71 Q58. Mean
= 3.00 / 4.57 Q60. Mean
= 3.50 / 3.86 Q61. Mean
= 3.00 / 4.43 Q62. Mean
= 2.50 / 3.71 Q63. Mean
= 2.50 / 3.29 Q66. Mean
= 4.00 / 4.50 N2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q4.
= 40% / 86% Q5.
= 20% / 29% Q6.
= 60% / 57% Q7.
= 60% / 100% Q8.
= 80% / 100% E4.
= 100% / 100% C4.
= 100% / 100% E5.
= 100% / 100% C5.
= 80% / 86% E6. = 80% / 57%C6. = 100% / 86% E7.
= 60% / 86% C7.
= 40% / 86% E8.
= 20% / 0% C8.
= 0% / 0% E9.
= 20% / 29% C9.
= 0% / 0% E10.
= 60% / 86% C10.
= 80% / 57% Q21.
= 80% / 100% Q22.
= 40% / 86% Q23.
= 60% / 71% Q24.
= 60% / 86% Q25.
= 60% / 100% N3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 14.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 15.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Q11. = 100% / 100% / 75%Curriculum LevelNN1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q7. = 100% Student Evaluation Q11. a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelN1. EBI Graduate Survey Q41,
Q42, Q43, Q44, Q46, Q47, Q48, Q49, Q53, Q54, Q55: Criteria in these areas are met.
No remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Q56, Q57, Q58, Q58, Q60, Q61, Q62, Q63: Student experiences in these areas are
limited. Capstone design course needs
to address these issues. Lower level
courses should also incorporate these discussions when it is possible. Q66.
Increase the use of CAD/CAM/CAE and rapid prototyping machine in
course with design components and in the Capstone design class. N2. Alumni Survey Q4, Q5 Q6 and Q7: These areas are weak. The information should be made available to non-engineering course instructors. Need to exam MfgE curriculum to ensure proper coverage of these areas. Q8:
Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. E4,
C4, E5, C5: Criteria in these areas
are met. No remedial actions are
required. Evaluate in future for improvement. E7: Increase the use of computers in required,
core, and elective MfgE courses. C7: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. E8,
C8, E9 and C9: These areas are weak.
The information should be made available to non-engineering course
instructors and coop employers. Need
to exam MfgE curriculum to ensure proper coverage of these areas. However,
faculty thinks that these are not the focus of our program. E10,
C10: More use of computing technology in engineering analysis/design is
needed. This has been brought to
faculty’s attention in the winter term of 2002. Action plans will be discussed in the
spring 2002. Q21:
Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q22,
Q23, Q24 and Q25: These are soft outcomes and need to be better covered in
MfgE curriculum. Faculty committee has
met in the winter term of 2002 to exam the coverage of the soft outcomes. For example, include more discussions in
class and use projects that simulate real world business practices, and use
examples to discuss professional and ethical responsibilities. N3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1, 14 and 15: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. Q11: Employer and faculty think students
are doing well in this area but students do not entirely agree with it. Follow up and evaluate in future for
improvement. Curriculum LevelNN1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q7: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q11: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the manufacturability
of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to
significant positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
O. Have proficiency in manufacturing systems design:
understanding the analysis, synthesis and control of manufacturing operations
using statistical and calculus based methods, simulation, and information
technology. |
Program Outcomes LevelO1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. How do you rate your satisfaction with Q15. The opportunities for practical experiences within Undergraduate curriculum? Q26. The quality of computing resources? Q27. The availability of computers in Engineering School? Q28. The remote access to the computer network at your Engineering School? Q29. The training to utilize the computing resources at your Engineering School? To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to Q38. Design experiments? Q39. Conduct experiments? Q40. Analyze and interpret data? Q41. Design a system component or process to meet desired needs? Q42. Function on multidisciplinary teams? Q43. Identify or formulate engineering problems? Q44. Solve engineering problems? Q47. Use modern engineering tools? Q48. Communicate using oral progress reports? Q49. Communicate using written progress reports? Q50. Pilot test a component prior to implementation? Q51. use text materials to support project design? To what degree did your major design experience Q53. Build on the knowledge from previous course work? Q54. Build on skills from previous course work? Q55. Incorporate engineering standards? Q56. Address Economic issues? Q57. Address Environmental issues? Q58. Address Sustainability issues? Q59. Address Manufacturability issues? Q60. Address Ethical issues? Q61. Address Health and Safety issues? Q62. Address Social issues? Q63. Address Political issues? Q66. To what degree did the laboratory facilities allow you to use modern engineering tools? O2. Alumni Survey 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate
“medium increase” and above to the statement that their “degree to which
education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q2.
Mathematics (calculus and above) Q6.
Information Systems Q8.
Operations Design Q14.
Computer-aided Design Q16.
Statistical Analysis Q17.
Design of Experiments 80%
of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and above to the statement that
their “education and co-op experience increased their abilities to.” E1.
Function on multidisciplinary teams C1.
Function on multidisciplinary teams E3.
Solve open-ended problems C3.
Solve open-ended problems E4.
Analyze components, processes, or systems C4.
Analyze components, processes, or systems E5. Design components, processes, or systems C5.
Design components, processes, or systems E6.
Use computing technology in communication C6.
Use computing technology in communication E7.
Use computing technology in engineering analysis/design C7.
Use computing technology in engineering analysis/design E10.
Use computing technology in operations analysis/design C10.
Use computing technology in operations analysis/design 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and
above to the statement that their “education and co-op experience increased
your awareness of ” Q21.
Current engineering practices Q23.
Current business practices Q25.
Professional/ethical responsibilities O3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 1. Technical Skills: Application of technical abilities and accuracy. Q11: Demonstrated ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Curriculum LevelOO1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q7: Demonstrated ability to use the
techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
practice. Student Evaluation Q11: Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering
tools necessary for engineering practice. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelO1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q15. Mean
= 3.50 / 5.38 Q26. Mean = 5.50 / 5.50 Q27. Mean = 5.00 / 5.88 Q28. Mean = 6.00 / 3.86 Q29. Mean = 5.00 / 3.71 Q38. Mean = 5.00 / 4.75 Q39. Mean = 5.00 / 4.63 Q40. Mean = 5.00 / 5.63 Q41. Mean = 4.50 / 5.38 Q42. Mean = 6.50 / 5.25 Q43. Mean = 5.50 / 5.25 Q44. Mean = 5.50 / 5.50 Q47. Mean = 4.50 / 5.38 Q48. Mean = 6.00 / 5.00 Q49. Mean = 5.50 / 4.50 Q50. Mean
= 4.00 / 4.14 Q51. Mean = 5.00 / 4.50 Q53. Mean = 5.00 / 5.29 Q54. Mean = 4.50 / 5.71 Q55. Mean
= 4.50 / 5.57 Q56. Mean
= 3.50 / 4.29 Q57. Mean
= 3.00 / 3.71 Q58. Mean
= 3.00 / 4.57 Q59. Mean
= 4.00 / 5.86 Q60. Mean
= 3.50 / 3.86 Q61. Mean
= 3.00 / 4.43 Q62. Mean
= 2.50 / 3.71 Q63. Mean
= 2.50 / 3.29 Q66. Mean
= 4.00 / 4.50 O2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q2. = 100% / 100% Q6. = 60% / 57%Q8.
= 80% / 100% Q14.
= 80% / 100% Q16.
= 100% / 86% Q17.
= 80% / 86% E1.
= 80% / 100% C1.
= 80% / 100% E3.
= 100% / 100% C3.
= 100% / 86% E4.
= 100% / 100% C4.
= 100% / 100% E5.
= 100% / 100% C5.
= 80% / 86% E6. = 80% / 57%C6.
= 100% / 86% E7.
= 60% / 86% C7.
= 40% / 86% E10.
= 60% / 86% C10.
= 80% / 57% Q21.
= 80% / 100% Q23.
= 60% / 71% Q25.
= 60% / 100% O3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Q11. = 100% / 100% / 75%Curriculum LevelOO1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q7. = 100% Student Evaluation Q11. a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelO1. EBI Graduate Survey Q15: Increase the
opportunities for students to design and conduct experiments as well as to
analyze and interpret data in various laboratories. Q26, Q27: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q28, Q29: These areas seem improved based
on responses from 2000 to 2001. No
remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Q38, Q39, Q40, Q41, Q42, Q43, Q44, Q47, Q48, Q49:
Criteria in these areas are met. No
remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Q50: Increase the utilization of rapid prototyping
processes to make pilot products for experimentation and testing in MFGG 507
Polymer Processing and other classes. Q51, Q53, Q54, Q55: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. Q56, Q57, Q58, Q59, Q60, Q61, Q62, Q63: Student experiences in these areas are
limited. Capstone design course needs
to address these issues. Lower and
upper level courses should also incorporate these discussions when it is possible. Q66.
Increase the use of CAD/CAM/CAE and rapid prototyping machine in
course with design components and in the Capstone design class. O2. Alumni Survey Q6. Need to utilize more information system in
class and lab assignments. Q2, Q8, Q14, Q16 and Q17: Criteria in these areas
are met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. E1,
C1, E3, C3, E4, C4, E5 and C5: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. E6,
C6: Use of computing technology has been improved from 96-97 to 97-98
results. E7: Increase the use of computers in required,
core, and elective MfgE courses. C7: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. E10,
C10: More use of computing technology in engineering analysis/design is needed. This has been brought to faculty’s
attention in the winter term of 2002.
Action plans will be discussed in the spring 2002 Q21:
Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q23
and Q25: These are soft outcomes and need to be better covered in MfgE
curriculum. Faculty committee has met
in the winter term of 2002 to exam the coverage of the soft outcomes. For example, include more discussions in
class and use projects that simulate real world business practices, and use
examples to discuss professional and ethical responsibilities. O3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1: Criteria in this area\ are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q11: Employer and faculty think students
are doing well in this area but students do not entirely agree with it. Follow up and evaluate in future for
improvement. Curriculum LevelOO1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q7: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q11: Criteria in this area are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. |
KETTERING
FIVE COLUMN ASSESSMENT FORM
Outcomes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P
|
Academic Program Mission and Educational
Objectives |
Academic Program Outcomes |
Assessment Methods and Performance
Standards |
Assessment Results |
Use of Assessment Results |
|
Mission: The graduate of this program is able to
take a design and create a set of processes for fabrication and assembly
which will result in a finished product.
The product will have the required levels of quality and be produced
at minimum cost. As part of a product
team, the graduate will also be able to contribute ideas which improve the
manufacturability of the product under consideration. Program
Educational Objectives 1. be able to apply basic and
contemporary science, engineering, and experimentation skills to identifying
manufacturing problems and developing practical solutions. 2. be able to design, model,
analyze, and improve a manufacturing process or system utilizing modern
technologies. 3. be job-ready in a
manufacturing environment based on co-op experience as well as engineering
and communication skills. 4. understand professional and
ethical responsibilities and the impact of engineering towards societal and
global context. 5. function well as a team
member and be able to manage projects in a multi-disciplinary environment. 6. engage in continuing
professional development for life-long learning experiences. 7. advance quickly to significant
positions of leadership in their organization and profession. |
P. Have proficiency in
laboratory experience: graduates must be able to measure manufacturing
process variables in a manufacturing laboratory and make technical inferences
about the process. |
Program Outcomes LevelP1. EBI Graduate Survey Means of the responses from MfgE students
to the following questions should be better than 4.5 out of a 7-point
scale. How do you rate your satisfaction with Q15. The opportunities for practical experiences within Undergraduate curriculum? Q17. The value derived from team experiences? Q26. The quality of computing resources? Q27. The availability of computers in Engineering School? Q29. The training to utilize the computing resources at your Engineering School? To what degree did your engineering education enhance your ability to Q38. Design experiments? Q39. Conduct experiments? Q40. Analyze and interpret data? Q41. Design a system component or process to meet desired needs? Q42. Function on multidisciplinary teams? Q43. Identify or formulate engineering problems? Q44. Solve engineering problems? Q47. Use modern engineering tools? Q48. Communicate using oral progress reports? Q49. Communicate using written progress reports? To what degree did your major design experience Q53. Build on the knowledge from previous course work? Q54. Build on skills from previous course work? Q55. Incorporate engineering standards? Q56. Address Economic issues? Q57. Address Environmental issues? Q58. Address Sustainability issues? Q59. Address Manufacturability issues? Q60. Address Ethical issues? Q61. Address Health and Safety issues? Q62. Address Social issues? Q63. Address Political issues? Q64. To what degree did the laboratory facilities establish an atmosphere conductive to learning? Q66. To what degree did the laboratory facilities allow you to use modern engineering tools? P2. Alumni Survey 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate
“medium increase” and above to the statement that their “degree to which
education increased their knowledge and skills in: Q16. Statistical Analysis Q17. Design of Experiments 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate
“medium increase” and above to the statement that their “education and co-op
experience increased their abilities to” E1. Function on multidisciplinary teams C1. Function on multidisciplinary teams E4. Analyze components, processes, or systems C4. Analyze components, processes, or systems E5. Design components, processes, or systems C5. Design components, processes, or systems E6. Use computing technology in communication C6. Use computing technology in communication E7. Use computing technology in engineering analysis/design C7. Use computing technology in engineering analysis/design E10. Use computing technology in operations analysis/design C10. Use computing technology in operations analysis/design 80% of MfgE Alumni indicate “medium increase” and
above to the statement that their “education and co-op experience increased
your awareness of ” Q25. Professional/ethical responsibilities P3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 80% of responses indicate “satisfied/agree” and above to the following: 1. Technical Skills: Application of technical abilities and accuracy. 2. Analytical Skills: Application of data analysis 5. Methodologies: Application of research, testing and/or design methodologies. Q1: Demonstrated the ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and/or engineering. Q11: Demonstrated ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Curriculum LevelPP1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q2: Demonstrate the ability to design and
conduct experiments, analyze and interpret data. Q7: Demonstrated ability to use the
techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
practice. Student Evaluation Q2: Ability to design and conduct
experiments, analyze and interpret data. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience Q11: Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering
tools necessary for engineering practice. a. Academic Preparation b. Co-op Experience |
Program Outcomes LevelP1. EBI Graduate Survey Format Q##. Mean = 2001/2000 results Q15. Mean
= 3.50 / 5.38 Q17. Mean = 5.00 / 5.00 Q26. Mean = 5.50 / 5.50 Q27. Mean = 5.00 / 5.88 Q29. Mean
= 5.00 / 3.71 Q38. Mean = 5.00 / 4.75 Q39. Mean = 5.00 / 4.63 Q40. Mean = 5.00 / 5.63 Q41. Mean = 4.50 / 5.38 Q42. Mean = 6.50 / 5.25 Q43. Mean = 5.50 / 5.25 Q44. Mean = 5.50 / 5.50 Q47. Mean = 4.50 / 5.38 Q48. Mean = 6.00 / 5.00 Q49. Mean = 5.50 / 4.50 Q53. Mean = 5.00 / 5.29 Q54. Mean = 4.50 / 5.71 Q55. Mean = 4.50 / 5.57 Q56. Mean
= 3.50 / 4.29 Q57. Mean
= 3.00 / 3.71 Q58. Mean
= 3.00 / 4.57 Q59. Mean
= 4.00 / 5.86 Q60. Mean
= 3.50 / 3.86 Q61. Mean
= 3.00 / 4.43 Q62. Mean
= 2.50 / 3.71 Q63. Mean
= 2.50 / 3.29 Q64. Mean = 5.00 / 5.00 Q66. Mean
= 4.00 / 4.50 P2. Alumni Survey Format Q#. = 97-98 / 96-97 results Q16.
= 100% / 86% Q17.
= 80% / 86% E1.
= 80% / 100% C1.
= 80% / 100% E4.
= 100% / 100% C4.
= 100% / 100% E5.
= 100% / 100% C5.
= 80% / 86% E6. = 80% / 57%C6.
= 100% / 86% E7.
= 60% / 86% C7.
= 40% / 86% E10.
= 60% / 86% C10.
= 80% / 57% Q25. = 60% / 100%P3. Thesis Project
Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 2.
= 100% / 100% / 100% 5.
= 100% / 100% / 100% Q1. = 100% / 100% / 75%Q11. = 100% / 100% / 75%Curriculum LevelPP1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q2. = 80% Q7. = 100% Student EvaluationQ2. a. = 100% b. = 100% Q11. a. = 100% b. = 100% |
Program Outcomes LevelP1. EBI Graduate Survey Q15: Increase the
opportunities for students to design and conduct experiments as well as to
analyze and interpret data in various laboratories. Q17, Q26, Q27: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. Q29: This area seems improved based on
responses from 2000 to 2001. No
remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Q38, Q39, Q40, Q41, Q42, Q43, Q44, Q47, Q48, Q49:
Criteria in these areas are met. No
remedial actions are required. Evaluate in future for improvement. Q53, Q54, Q55: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. Q56, Q57, Q58, Q59, Q60, Q61, Q62, Q63: Student experiences in these areas are
limited. Capstone design course needs
to address these issues. Lower and
upper level courses should also incorporate these discussions when it is
possible. Q64: Criteria in this area is met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q66.
Increase the use of CAD/CAM/CAE and rapid prototyping machine in
course with design components and in the Capstone design class. P2. Alumni Survey Q16
and Q17: Criteria in these areas are
met. No remedial actions are required.
Evaluate in future for improvement. E1,
C1, E4, C4, E5 and C5: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. E7: Increase the use of computers in required,
core, and elective MfgE courses. C7: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. E10:
Increase the use of computers and software in operations analysis/design in
MfgE core and elective courses. C10: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. Q25: This information should be made available to
co-op employers. P3. Thesis Project Evaluation Employer / Faculty /
Student Evaluations 1, 2, and 5: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Q1, Q11: Employer and faculty think
students are doing well in this area but students do not entirely agree with
it. Follow up and evaluate in future
for improvement. Curriculum LevelPP1. Co-op Program Work
Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation Q2, Q7: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. Student Evaluation Q2, Q11: Criteria in these areas are met. No remedial actions are required. Evaluate
in future for improvement. |